Let’s face it: Most audiophiles are into cone loudspeakers. And why not? They’re plentiful, good-sounding, and (at least in many cases) quite affordable. Though force of habit is a powerful thing, what if there were an alternative that was every bit as good-sounding (maybe even better-sounding) and just as affordable, only it didn’t have cones and didn’t come in a box? Although I imagine most of you have already made their acquaintance in previous versions, let me introduce you to Magnepan’s latest “mini” planar dipole, the two-way, floorstanding, all-quasi-ribbon-driver MG .7—a speaker that is capable of a more natural and full-range sound than any previous “mini” Maggie, and a more natural and full-range sound than anyone might reasonably expect for the money.
The .7s Versus Your Room
Let me say right off the bat that these are very impressive speakers offering a practically unbeatable quality-to-cost ratio. Of course, they do have certain peculiarities. For one thing, with Magnepans proper setup in your room is arguably more critical than it is with most other types of speakers. It certainly took some experimentation with positioning to get the .7s to sound their best (though the result was worth every minute of effort). Happily, these guys aren’t too heavy, only 27 pounds each, so they can easily be shifted around to suit your room’s needs—even by a gal!
Though small by Maggie standards, the .7s are still four-and-a-half-foot-tall, one-foot-four-inch-wide rectangular panels about the height of a largish dynamic floorstander, a little wider than same, and, at under an inch in depth, about twenty times thinner. Their figure-8 dipolar dispersion (see below) makes sidewall reflections less of an issue with the .7s than it is with wide-dispersion cones; however, if the .7s (or any Maggies) are toed-in toward the listener rather than made parallel to the backwall, then part of their rear wave will bounce off sidewalls, potentially adding (as it does with any loudspeaker) brightness from early-arrival reflections. What this means is that with Maggies you should take some of the same care in placement vis-à-vis sidewalls as you would with any loudspeaker, especially if you toe the speakers in.
The Maggies should also be placed a reasonable distance from back walls, in order to avoid doubling and/or cancellation in the bass from the dipolar .7s’ out-of-phase rearwave. (In the end I set them up about three-and-a-half feet from the rear walls.)
Unlike most dynamic loudspeakers, the Maggies can be positioned with their tweeters in different locations—to the inside of the speaker, firing more or less directly at you, or on the outside of the speaker, firing less directly at you. All you need to do to change the tweeter orientation is swap the left speaker for the right one. Obviously the location of the tweeter makes a difference in tonal balance, imaging, and soundstaging. Though JV and I preferred the sound of the .7s with their tweeter to the outside in the room in which we were listening, the inside position did have more presence, image focus, and treble energy. Obviously any decision about tweeter orientation will depend on the size of your room and how far you’re seated from the panels.
Once again like all Maggies, the quasi-ribbon panels of the .7s need some break-in before they sound their best. Though quite listenable out of the box, they will sound better (less bright in the upper mids, more filled-out, freed-up, and energetic in the bass) with several weeks of play.
The .7 Versus The MMG
At 15-1/4 inches wide and 54-1/4 inches tall, the .7s are about an inch wider and better than six inches taller than Maggie’s other much-less-expensive two-way “mini,” the MMG. However, unlike the MMG, both the tweeter and the midrange/bass panels of the .7s are quasi-ribbons (as opposed to quasi-ribbon and planar-magnetic, for which see JV’s sidebar), giving the new Maggie an audible leg up in speed, resolution, bandwidth, and overall coherence over their little brothers. Not only are the .7s more extended in the treble than the MMGs; thanks to their considerably larger mid/bass panels they are also more extended in the low end, which Jon and I judged to go down more or less linearly into the low 50s. Perhaps the best news is that they will only set you back mere pocket-change (for high-end gear): $1395 the pair.
The .7s Versus Cones
As you probably already know, planar speakers use a different kind of technology than cone or horn loudspeakers. The most obvious visible difference is that there’s no box to “house” the drivers or to damp their backwave—and thus no “box coloration.” Planars produce equal amounts of sound front and back, and, at least in theory, use the room (or the distance between their panels and the walls) to “damp” or attenuate their rear wave.
What you can’t see in a planar speaker is the drivers themselves, which are also very different than cones. The .7s use ultra-low-mass strips of aluminum bonded to very thin sheets of Mylar as drivers. Suspended between permanent bar magnets, these featherweight “quasi-ribbons” are faster and lower in distortion than much-more-massive cones. (Once again, see Jon’s sidebar for an explanation of how quasi-ribbons work.)
It may be obvious, but a driver’s mass and a speaker’s box inevitably and profoundly affect what you hear. Magneplanars offer the advantages of an extremely low-mass/low-inertia/large-surface-area driver suspended in a more open, unrestricted, less resonant and resonance-prone framework than that of a dynamic loudspeaker’s massive enclosure. All of this results in a boxless “airiness” to the sound and a naturalness of timbre that allow acoustic instruments to shine.
The .7s Versus Music
In my listening tests, I spun a wide range of LPs and some digital tracks, too. At the risk of sounding cliché, my musical tastes really run the gamut. (If you saw my record collection, you might even wonder whether I had multiple personalities!) Anyway, I’d like to share some listening examples and how the Maggie .7s fared with each.
I knew going in that no speaker is going to be perfect on every kind of music, and that perhaps the most important consideration for a potential buyer is how well his listening preferences match up with a speaker’s characteristics: with what the speaker does well, and what it doesn’t do as well. Magneplanars are famous for their accurate reproduction of the midrange, so I expected them to deliver impressively realistic sound with almost all acoustic instruments (save perhaps for big bands and very large orchestras). And deliver they did!
On digital tracks from Temptation, Holly Cole’s well-known covers of Tom Waits tunes, the “airiness” of the sound of the Maggies was a match made in heaven with Cole’s breathy vocals. “(Looking for) The Heart of a Saturday Night” was a real standout in its faithful sonic reproduction of the entire Holly Cole Trio’s stellar performance. Translation: The recording sounded beautiful and true-to-life. Also, I could swear that the presentation, while open and graced with a striking measure of air and light, felt like it existed within some precisely (almost mathematically) defined soundfield. Quite a large field, but still a space with a specific form and shape that was different than the form and shape of the listening room. I suppose what I’m talking about is a “soundstage,” the .7s’ recreation of which was kind of stunning. When you add this remarkable reproduction of ambient space to the .7s’ natural timbre, they are clearly an excellent choice for acoustic music recorded live or in an actual hall.
With Temptation, the only time the .7s took a dive was on a few, big, low bass notes in the opening bars of “Jersey Girl,” where there was some audible clipping as the .7s reached/exceeded their excursions limit, although the volume I was listening at was fairly substantial.
Which brings me to bass-heavy rock and roll.
Personally, I tend to like a little bit of added color and drama with such music. I enjoy experiencing the weight of a Fender bass guitar and feeling the punch/impact of a kickdrum. And on their own the .7s just don’t do this particular trick the way cones do.
So I decided to bring some JL Audio subwoofers into the mix. (It’s worth noting that Magnepan offers its own add-on woofer option, the Magneplanar Bass Panel or DWM, which essentially contains two bass drivers on one thin-film planar-magnetic panel. Because they’re “all-Maggie,” the DWMs might integrate very seamlessly. I would certainly like to give them a test drive when I get the opportunity. Hopefully I’ll be able to report back soon.)
With some rock and roll, the JL Audio subwoofers added needed muscle and punch. A high-res digital file of the Stones’ “Gimme Shelter,” for instance, sounded big, brash, and bold with the subwoofed .7s. And not just in the bottom octaves. You could also better feel the weight and power of Merry Clayton’s “backing” vocals—not to mention Keith Richards’ driving guitar. A couple of cuts from the Pixies’ indie/post-punk Surfer Rosa on vinyl sounded heavier than thou. The insistent throb of “Cactus” and the building, searing strains of “Where Is My Mind?” simply filled the room. This was music you could hear and feel.
That said, weight isn’t everything.
On much music the magic of pure, authentic acoustics rang true through these Magnepans to very satisfying effect with no subwoofers required. For instance, “The Girl from Ipanema” from the 1964 eponymous Getz/Gilberto album sounded infinitely more spacious and open without the subs. The song floated and soared in all its subtle, understated beauty. Also on the jazz front, Coleman Hawkins Encounters Ben Webster was a captivating experience without subs. The breathiness and buzzy vibrations from Hawkins’ tenor saxophone reed sounded incredibly real and present. The soundstaging felt true-to-life. The piano’s low notes were clear and warm. You could easily pick up nuances of the recording space.
The bottom line is this: As I spent more time experimenting with the .7 speakers both with and without the addition of subwoofers, I discovered that I definitely preferred some music with them, but many selections without. Generally speaking, I found my preferences fell along lines of musical genres, though sometimes even those lines got a little blurred.
Without subs, for example, the acoustic/electric sound of the live version of “Late in the Evening,” from Simon & Garfunkel: The Concert in Central Park made me want to dance to its catchy salsa rhythms. Closing your eyes you could picture the stage full of instruments in a rich scene that must have been an unforgettable concert experience.
Even some classic rock tracks (particularly those without big driving bass) worked well without the subwoofers. On David Bowie’s “Diamond Dogs,” the solid percussion came through vividly and felt balanced against the raw electric guitar and the rocking piano via the .7s all by themselves. (And that cowbell never sounded better.)
The .7s Versus Amplifiers
But before you start thinking we’re entering some sort of hi-fi utopia, know that while this design eliminates some variables from the equation, it also brings with it other demands and considerations.
For one, the .7s are a bit power-hungry: They require an amplifier capable of driving a low-sensitivity 4-ohm load. I listened first with a tube amp, but definitely heard better results with a solid-state one. Why? The tube amp gave almost too much leeway to the bass, making it less clearly defined. This also left the upper midrange more exposed (i.e., a shade bright). Some might like the more forward projection (not unlike what you’d hear from horn loudspeakers) of tubes, but I liked the more blended, balanced feel of the solid-state amp, so I stuck with that for most of my listening.
The .7s Versus You
At a tough-to-beat price point that would make even the thriftiest loudspeaker lovers open their wallets, the .7s become even more attractive when you consider that Magnepan is also offering a 30-day in-home trial and a money-back guarantee. Whether you’re in the market for a starter pair of high-quality speakers, or have the proverbial champagne taste on a beer budget (or both!), why wouldn’t you consider these babies? They’re terrific.
SPECS & PRICING
Type: Two-way floorstanding planar loudspeaker with quasi-ribbon tweeter and quasi-ribbon mid/woofer
Frequency response: 50Hz–24kHz +/-3dB
Impedance: 4 ohms
Sensitivity: 86dB/2.83V/1 meter, 500Hz
Dimensions: 15 1/4″ x 54 1/4″ x 1/2″
Weight: 27 lbs. (each)
1645 Ninth Street
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Read Next From ReviewSee all
Editors’ Choice: Turntables $50,000 and Up
Our editors have evaluated turntables over the past several years (newer isn’t always better!) and discussed which products stand out as having merit for likely applications, including room size and ancillary equipment. Here are our recommendations for 2022 $50000 and up.
- by Jesse Brede
- Jun 21st, 2022
Editors’ Choice: Loudspeakers $100,000 and Up
Our editors have evaluated loudspeakers over the past several years (newer isn’t always better!) and discussed which products stand out as having merit for likely applications, including room size and ancillary equipment. Here are our recommendations for 2022 $100,000 and up.
- by Jesse Brede
- Jun 21st, 2022
Ideon Audio Absolute Epsilon DAC, Absolute Stream Streamer, and Absolute Time Master Clock
This three-piece digital stack from Greece’s Ideon Audio takes its place within the upper echelon of today’s best digital-playback systems. Robert Harley brings you a full report.
- by TAS Staff
- Jun 14th, 2022