It would be no exaggeration to label most tube amplifiers today as derivatives of designs that originated in the 1950s. And output-transformerless (OTL) tube amps are no exception. With the benefit of hindsight, it is obvious that the early 1950s were an incubator for various OTL types. From the many competing designs, two emerged that have withstood the test of time. The Futterman circuit is by now celebrated as a classic, and in its model H-3 incarnation experienced a short commercial run during the 60s and 70s. In parallel with Futterman’s work, a major OTL alternative emerged that eventually became known as the “Circlotron” in 1955, thanks to the marketing folks at Electro-Voice; a totally cool name that for me evokes a mental image of a cyclotron particle accelerator. It seems that this circuit was invented independently by several designers. In the U.S., Cecil T. Hall filed a patent in 1951 (granted in 1955) for an OTL, described as a “parallel opposed power amplifier.” In Finland, Tapio Köykkä filed a patent in 1952 for a similar topology (but transformer coupled), which he dubbed “push-pull parallel amplifier.” And in Japan in 1952 Satoshi Shimada published an OTL circuit referred to as “cross shunt push-pull.” In 1954 Alpha M. Wiggins at Electro-Voice filed a patent for a transformer-coupled Circlotron design, which strangely did not reference the Hall and Köykkä patents, but paved the way for Electro-Voice to market several Circlotron amplifiers in the mid-to-late 1950s without apparently much commercial success. Some 30 years later Atma-Sphere’s Ralph Karsten filed a U.S. patent for a circlotronic OTL amplifier and went on almost single-handedly to refine and popularize this design.
One minor complication introduced by a Circlotron is the requirement for two independent high voltage supplies to power each section of the output stage. However, its major advantage over the Futterman circuit lies in its inherently balanced topology, with both the push and pull sections of the output stage operating as cathode followers. Futterman had to resort to positive feedback in order to balance his single-ended push-pull output stage, and mistakenly believed that both output sections were performing as cathode followers. In reality, both sections worked as common cathode circuits, raising the intrinsic output impedance relative to that of a Circlotron. Futterman decided to apply negative feedback aggressively in order to reduce both output impedance and distortion products.
Atma-Sphere’s Circlotron-based S-30 OTL amplifier reviewed here is by now a mature product. The latest iteration, the Mk3.3 Series of amplifiers, essentially incorporates the driver circuit of the next amp up in the lineup from the Mk3.2 version. That is to say, the S-30 now has the driver of the M-60, while the M-60 now has the driver circuit of the MA-1, and so on. Five 6AS7G twin power triodes are used per channel and are biased for Class A operation. The 6AS7G certainly qualifies as an OTL output tube due to its low plate resistance; you just need a lot of them in parallel due to its rather modest 13 watt plate dissipation per section. Atma-Sphere now uses mostly the Russian 6H13 rather than the Chinese 6N13. Both are 6AS7G equivalents, and according to Ralph Karsten, the Russian tube is a bit more robust but otherwise should sound identical. If all goes well and the amp isn’t pushed hard all the time, Ralph expects the lifetime of the power tubes to exceed 10,000 hours. Each half of the output stage comprises five triode sections connected in parallel for increased current delivery. Even without global negative feedback the theoretical output impedance should be about 14 ohms. Karsten uses a miniscule 2dB of feedback to further reduce the output impedance, the official impedance spec being 7 ohms, while I measured 10.6 ohms at 1kHz.
The reason to dwell on this topic is that an amp’s output or source impedance interacts with the loudspeaker’s impedance magnitude to alter the speaker’s frequency response. These EQ effects are magnified whenever the load impedance is on the order of the amp’s source impedance. Instead of delivering a constant voltage, high source impedance amps begin to approximate constant power delivery. That’s not necessarily a bad deal for a vented speaker with large impedance peaks in the bass range. Constant power means a bass response boost for such a speaker, and in some cases, welcome bass extension. That, for example, was the basis of the Fisher Z-Matic circuit in the 1950s, which allowed the user to adjust the amplifier’s source impedance continuously in order to control the speaker’s bass response. My Basszilla DIY speaker expects to see several ohms of source impedance. But at 7 to 10 ohms the effect was to over emphasize the deep bass. The solution was to insert acoustic foam plugs into the bass-reflex vents. That resulted in a Goldilocks bass balance—just right for my listening room!
The Basszilla was right for the S-30 for two other reasons. With a sensitivity of 96dB, its appetite is satisfied with merely a handful of watts, so the S-30’s 30 to 45Wpc represented more than an adequate power reserve. In addition, its impedance magnitude is reasonably benign. It’s important to realize that any OTL is a specialty amp that requires care in partnering with a prospective speaker. Sadly, we live in a world where the norm is to deconstruct an audio system into individual components; by and large, system-matching has become a lost art. Limiting current delivery into a potential speaker load is a major consideration and there’s no question that any OTL would be more comfortable with a 16 ohm rather than an 8 ohm nominal load. The reality is that most speakers today inhabit the 4 to 8 ohm impedance universe—16 ohm speakers are almost impossible to find. The next best thing is an 8 ohm speaker, and by all means, avoid 4 ohm loads. Ultimately, the sonic destiny of any OTL is closely dependent on the associated loudspeaker. What you think it sounds like will depend on your choice of speaker.
Right out of the box my review sample exhibited a fairly loud buzz in the left channel. It was loud enough to be heard at the listening seat during quiet musical passages. Karsten indicated that this issue has occasionally popped up in the field after an amp left the factory and attributed the cause to a power supply resonance, an interaction between the inductance of the power transformer winding feeding the rectifiers and the capacitance at the rectifier junctions. Apparently, standard silicon rectifiers when properly snubbed are usually silent even with high-efficiency loudspeakers. But when an S-30 buzz issue arises, the fix is to replace them with a high-current HEXFRED bridge rectifier that once neutralized is super-quiet. The buzz was too annoying, and so my sample was off to the factory for replacement of the rectifiers. This did the trick. The right channel was dead quiet and the residual buzz in the left channel was now almost inaudible to the point that I had to move my ear next to the speaker to hear it.
The tube complement is totally octal. There are three 6SN7s per channel, apparently of Chinese origin, which are configured as voltage gain and phase-splitter stages. The S-30 accepts both balanced and unbalanced inputs. Since none of the preamps in my current portfolio are balanced, this review was limited to using the RCA inputs. When using the RCA inputs, make sure that shorting jumpers are installed on the XLR connectors between pins 1 and 3. The turn on sequence is also worth mentioning. It’s essential, at least if you wish to extend output-tube lifetime, to first turn on the power switch on the left side of the chassis. This allows all of the filaments to warm up, and Atma-Sphere recommends waiting one to two minutes before activating the standby switch on the right, which applies high voltage to the power triodes. Since the S-30 is directly coupled to the speaker without a blocking capacitor, it is possible for significant DC offset current to flow through the load. DC offsets for both channels can be checked using the front-panel meter and nulled out using dedicated pots. This meter was good enough to tweak the DC offset voltage to less than 50mV. If you desire more accuracy connect a digital volt meter (300mV DC scale or better) to each set of speaker terminals. This way you can adjust the DC offset to near zero. But in all honesty, this is probably overkill since DC offsets of even 50mV are perfectly fine.
Aside from the need to tune the bass output, the other first impression was of a slightly recessed treble range. It was the sort of tonal balance that highlighted the midrange. And there is no need to mince words here: The mids were drop-dead gorgeous—pure, detailed, and sensuous. Various front end substitutions only served to confirm that the S-30 was lacking a bit of presence region—that is the range from 3kHz to 8 kHz was a bit subdued, though I can’t state with certainty whether this is an intrinsic characteristic or (more likely) caused by a speaker load interaction. The S-30 took about 30 minutes to sound its best, and when it did, it became clear that it was capable of delivering an outstanding first watt. The majesty of the cello was fully fleshed out with finely detailed and luxurious textures. Vocals were nuanced dynamically and delivered with plenty of emotional drama. Image outlines were palpably etched within the confines of a spacious soundstage with an impressive depth perspective. Could the midrange get any better? I reached into my collection of vintage 6SN7s and rolled in a sextet of 6SN7GTB types, mostly RCAs. The answer was a resounding yes! Think sweeter, smoother harmonic textures. If you would rather invest in just a couple of vintage 6SN7s, replace the front pair. In trying to voice the amp for a slightly livelier tone, the 6F8G, the mother of all 6SN7s, worked well for me. You’ll need a pin-out adapter, but this tube is well worth the extra effort. It brought a shade of romanticism to the upper mids that compensated nicely for the S-30’s slightly dark presentation.
Although the S-30 is pitched as an entry-level product, I found it capable of competing favorably with far more expensive amps. A case in point is the First Watt SIT-1, an exceptional single-ended solid-state design from the fertile mind of Nelson Pass. While the S-30 lacked the full measure of the SIT-1’s bass impact and midrange transparency, it made up for it by being oh so much more seductive. Coupled with a wonderful reproduction of soundstage depth perspective, the S-30 loudly proclaimed its tube heritage. There was no mistaking its tube virtues.
It was also instructive to contrast the sound of the S-30 with that of a pair of refurbished Leak TL12+ monoblocks; an EL84-based ultralinear design from the late 1950s. This rather conventional transformer-coupled British classic has gained quite a following in recent years due to its absolutely lovely sonic character: it sings with sweet textures, tight bass lines, and accurate tonal colors. Matched up against the S-30 it sounded a bit polite dynamically and lacked the OTL’s engaging intimacy. There are good engineering reasons for eliminating the output transformer, and from a perceptual standpoint the payoff is increased transient speed, coherency, and immediacy. The S-30 delivered on the promise of a good OTL, eliminating a layer of complexity and nudging me closer to the musical experience.
It shouldn’t surprise you to learn that I own a Futterman H-3 amplifier, a fairly recent purchase that has been lovingly refurbished. There’s no doubt in my mind that the H-3 is still a contender today, a full 50 years after its introduction. But it’s a tweaky product that the average consumer would have a difficult time maintaining. Naturally, I was curious about a confrontation, Futterman vs. Circlotron, a mano-a-mano duel for OTL supremacy. Let me start by saying that both amps acquitted themselves very well, perhaps on balance I would award the S-30 a narrow decision, though there were noticeable sonic differences. The H-3 was the more tonally neutral of the two, which I think is due to its much lower source impedance and thus minimal load interaction. In particular, the presence region was reproduced more realistically. In this regard, the S-30 benefitted from being mated with a brighter front end. The S-30’s midrange textures were purer and sweeter sounding, and I came to realize that I wasn’t totally happy with H-3’s capacitor coupling of the output stage. Listening through a large and mostly electrolytic cap bank seemed to add a slight layer of grit and veiling to the sound.
Although the S-30 is guilty of slight timbre alterations, and presents a somewhat dark tonal balance, these acts of commission, most likely due to load interactions, did not generally interfere with the music, but point out the need to mate the amp with a compatible loudspeaker and front-end electronics. The S-30 lights a fire under the soundstage, illuminating it with commendable transparency. By eliminating the output transformer, the S-30 is able to connect the listener more intimately with the music than a host of more expensive transformer-coupled designs. The Atma-Sphere S-30 strikes an intelligent balance between quality and quantity, focusing as it does on delivering a strong first watt. Its asking price is a small price to pay for such a sizeable chunk of musical joy. Highly recommended!
SPECS & PRICING
Power output: 30Wpc into 8 ohms, 45Wpc into 16 ohms
Input impedance: 100k ohms single-ended, 200k ohms balanced
Input sensitivity: 3V
Gain: 23dB at 8 ohms
Power bandwidth: 2Hz–75kHz +/- 0.5dB
Frequency response: 1Hz–200kHz, +/–3dB
Dimensions: 17″ x 8″ x 13″
Weight: 24 lbs.
ATMA-SPHERE MUSIC SYSTEMS, INC.
1742 Selby Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55104
Basszilla Platinum Edition DIY loudspeaker; Audible Illusions L3A line preamp; Brown Audio Labs SP-1B preamp; Experience Music autoformer volume control; Kuzma Stabi Reference, Revox B795, and Sony PS-X600 turntables; MacBook Pro laptop running Amarra V3.03 software, April Music Eximus DP1 DAC; ModWright modified Sony XA-5400ES SACD player: FMS Nexus-2, Wire World, and Kimber KCAG interconnects; Kimber KCAG speaker cable; Monarchy Audio AC-Regenerator; Sound Application power line conditioners
By Dick Olsher
Although educated as a nuclear engineer at the University of Florida, I spent most of my career, 30 years to be exact, employed as a radiation physicist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, from which I retired in 2008.More articles from this editor
Read Next From ReviewSee all
2020 Product of the Year Awards | High-End Loudspeaker of the Year
Yamaha NS-5000 $15,000 An effort of 19 engineers and 8 […]
- by TAS Staff
- Feb 22nd, 2021
2020 Product of the Year Awards | Solid-State Power Amplifiers
Rogue Audio Dragon $3995 Boasting 300Wpc into 8 ohms (500Wpc […]
- by TAS Staff
- Feb 12th, 2021